Wednesday, 05 October 2011 11:36

Improving the Estimation Process

Written by 
Rate this item
(0 votes)

FEATUREOct5thEstimating is defined as an informed assessment of an uncertain event. For project managers, accurate estimates are the foundation for effective project planning and execution. There are many processes that have been developed to assist in the estimation process. Without proper estimating of project duration, cost, resources, risks and other parameters, it is impossible to implement proper alternatives and ultimately make timely and sound decisions.

There are five (5) main steps that an effective project management program engages to maximize success of projects which include: project planning; project baseline; reporting; change control; and project closure. Each of these steps rely upon accurate estimating and proper control to ensure project success. So what are some typical events that may impact the validity of your estimates?

  1. Poorly defined scope of work. This includes misinterpreted work elements, or the task granularity (detail) is not adequate for current phase of the project life cycle (PLC).
  2. Lack of knowledge for internal project cost (typically inability to determine accurate crew cost, resource productivity rates, indirects, etc).
  3. Inflated Optimism. The proverbial rose colored glasses way of guessing project problems or events.
  4. Inadequate risk management. Ignoring risks and uncertainty will skew the estimates and expectations become unrealistic.
  5. Time pressure or unrealistic targets. This is a miscalculation of the time a project task will take and failure to communicate what is reasonably achievable.
  6. Adoption of inappropriate estimation methodologies.
  7. Failure to utilize historical data or lack of accurate, meaningful historical data.  With so  
  8. many factors that could possible cause estimate inaccuracies, what can be done to make
  9. Your estimates the most accurate?
  10. Educate your project team and organization on estimating and require the appropriate project team members prepare the estimate associated with their scope aspect of the project.
  11. Reach out to a subject matter expert (SME) with experience for scenarios.
  12. Incorporate peer reviews and estimate validation processes into your PLC.
  13. Incorporate Risk Management and contingency assessment /re-assessment throughout the PLC
  14. Encourage estimate review and validation after each phase of the PLC.
  15. Accurate and timely documentation of change requests.
  16. Research historical data on the project effort, schedule, cost, risk and resources for lessons learned and make appropriate adjustments. Statistical baselines should be and revised periodically.
  17. Use mock ups, trial runs, field studies or other simulations as a guide.
  18. Adequately define work scope and accurately track time against each task.
  19. Develop and maintain Basis of Estimate Document.

Project Estimation should consider validation of project performance as measured against the plan for purposes of evaluating estimate accuracy and ensuring proper methodology is utilized. Metrics based on comparison of project estimates and corresponding actuals should also be utilized when making decisions regarding estimates of remaining or future work. A sound risk management program should also be implemented and should capture risk occurrence for current and future reference. Estimates should include applicable adjustments relative to risk management policies where necessary. Proper incorporation of Risk management into the estimating process will reduce project uncertainties and will enable better estimates. Finally, estimation methodologies should provide a basis for developing performance metrics used to determine project health and provide capability to make informed decisions on contingencies. It is important to develop a consistent process that can be utilized (on a graded approach if necessary) in all phases of the PLC.

In conclusion, there is an unrealistic pressure to complete projects faster, cheaper and more efficiently. By developing and implementing these control points into the estimating process, you increase your estimate accuracy and improve the probability of delivering projects accurately and timely.

Don't forget to leave your comments below.


Josh Medica, CEO and President of Integrated Consulting. Josh’s passion and commitment to project excellence has established him as a project management/project controls industry expert. He transferred that passion and knowledge into executive level master training classes on all topics related to project management and project controls.  Josh has facilitated risk workshops on projects ranging from id="mce_marker"0 MM to $2 BB .  His dynamic and thought provoking presentation style has positioned him as a leading trainer/educator. His speaking circuit also includes house training for large EPC companies, engineering companies, and major oil companies across the globe.

Read 5306 times Last modified on Wednesday, 05 October 2011 15:05

Comments  

 
0 # Ian Rutgers 2011-10-05 05:15
This is a good starter article on the subject ... (you need to check your formatting ... some of the numbers are meant to be a new paragraph with a new set of numbers below it).
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Ed Bebee 2011-10-05 05:41
@Ian Rutgers: "you need to check your formatting ..." Due no doubt to the unrealistic pressure to complete blog posts faster ;) #3 on the list is one of the trickier ones to navigate because the PM may have help being overly-optimist ic. For example, a programmer may think a particular task is easy and equate that to "quick". There's also the related problem of not accounting for the players. If a particular client or manager is difficult to deal with, a micro-manager, etc, that can potentially add weeks that wouldn't be necessary if a different individual was involved in the project.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # $udhi 2011-10-05 17:39
Hi Josh, This is really a nice and note worthy article to start with for estimation. This article could have been better if you have mentioned the standard estimation techniques and any tools. Probably we can expect a 2nd article from you on this :)
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Vernon Stonerock 2011-10-06 05:53
When I do a detail WBS lets say 500 or more elements I usually do not win the contract. How much detail is enough? As you know with 100 elements you will not be as accurate as 500 elements i.e. more detail. What is the answer? Vern
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Amit Chaudhary 2011-10-06 15:13
nice article...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Monica 2011-11-09 06:11
An additional thought is that many projects are estimated to have a certain number of resources, and that often mat be adhered to, however it makes ALL the difference in the world, of who those resources are or if they are constantly changing. One of my pet peeves as a BA is that I will be told I will have a certain number of resources allocated, but they may change 3 times during a project, or the skillset is not what was expected. I think estimates need to include the Who when estimating and if the 'who' changes than just because you have had constant bodies on a project does not mean you are getting the same productivity. Ramp up time is rarely considered, or if it is considered, never given enough realistic time.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment