Comments for Why Debate? Let Formality and Agility Coexist at http://www.projecttimes.com , comment 1 to 4 out of 4 comments http://www.projecttimes.com Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:08:15 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.projecttimes.com/george-pitagorsky/why-debate-let-formality-and-agility-coexist.html#comment-227 Thanks. Scott Ambler's info is good and clearly supports the usefulness of Agile approach. Let's not be too hard on those who want proof - even early adapters want proof. They are just willing to experiment and take some risk to get it. I didn't see any stats on the number of organizations that attempt to implement Agile and fail. I wonder what the success rate is? - gpitagorsky Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:03:56 +0100 http://www.projecttimes.com/george-pitagorsky/why-debate-let-formality-and-agility-coexist.html#comment-226 Scott Ambler has written some good information on just such information. You can find his thoughts and data at http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/proof.htm. Often sited are Dr. Dobb's surveys... http://www.ambysoft.com/surveys/success2008.html Check it out. - Gupzich Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:44:38 +0100 http://www.projecttimes.com/george-pitagorsky/why-debate-let-formality-and-agility-coexist.html#comment-223 Thanks for the feedback. I haven't seen any statistical studies comparing Agile and other methodologies. It would be an interesting study though a large undertaking. Who might sponsor such a study? - gpitagorsky Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:02:29 +0100 http://www.projecttimes.com/george-pitagorsky/why-debate-let-formality-and-agility-coexist.html#comment-222 Well said, i also find it interesting that i cant find any research done on Agile V other project methodologies, and whether Agile can actually be proved to be more/less effective than any other methodology. I would love to see some good statistical analysis done along these lines...It would be a very large undertaking but interesting... - waynelingard1 Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:28:38 +0100