<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Positive Risk: An Idea Whose Time Should Never Have Come!</title>
		<description>Comments for Positive Risk: An Idea Whose Time Should Never Have Come! at http://www.projecttimes.com , comment 1 to 4 out of 4 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.projecttimes.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:06:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.projecttimes.com/claude-emond/positive-risk-an-idea-whose-time-should-never-have-come.html#comment-44</link>
			<description>Good argument, Claude. The PMBoK twisted the use of &quot;risk&quot; in a unconstructive,if not destructive, way. This will do no good to our communication with the public.

by Xianghui Liu - a guest</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:48:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.projecttimes.com/claude-emond/positive-risk-an-idea-whose-time-should-never-have-come.html#comment-15</link>
			<description>(continued)
I agree completely with Â«a guestÂ» that opportunities exist in risky situations (I was not arguing at all against that!!)
In fact there is an opportunity raising from all this risky business of Â«positive riskÂ», an opportunity that we should seize, is to train project managers and their teams to do proper SWOT on their projects. That. I do buy ! :)  - claueemond</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:44:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.projecttimes.com/claude-emond/positive-risk-an-idea-whose-time-should-never-have-come.html#comment-14</link>
			<description>I just propose here that we include as a PM tool the use of SWOT analysis. The way risks and opportunities are covered in the PMBOK right now, a text copied almost verbatim from an existing textbook,  is just as if we were doing just half a SWOT (the O and the T). Why not do it right the first time around, instead of inventing new concepts that add nothing to a technique that is used by boardrooms since 1969. - claueemond</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:41:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.projecttimes.com/claude-emond/positive-risk-an-idea-whose-time-should-never-have-come.html#comment-13</link>
			<description>Way too black and white. Don't buy it. Sorry. I don't see why opportunity must be construed as being &quot;contrary to risk&quot;. In this context, consider Viagra. It was researched as a treatment for controlling blood pressure. But it was found to have an interesting side effect one that was 'unpleasant' for the original project objectives (which were not met and the original project was a 'failure'), but was certainly an opportunity or favourable set of circumstances for doing something.  - a guest</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:52:50 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
