hansHans Jonasson, PMP, CBAP, founder of JTC Unlimited, has over 25 years of experience in the areas of project management, business analysis and professional development training. Hans started his career with Volvo LTD in Gothenburg, Sweden, in 1980 as a systems analyst/programmer. In 1984 he moved to United States to work on new development projects for EDS and General Motors. He has managed all aspects of software development projects varying from $100,000 to $10 Million for the automotive industry. He has been a Project Management Professional (PMP®) and member of the Project Management Institute (PMI®) since 1996. He is a member of the Great Lakes Chapter of PMI® and the International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBATM), and a Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAPTM). He has authored his first book titled Determining Project Requirements which was published in October 2007.

Why so much Talk about Earned Value? Who Uses it?

Earned Value Management, is one of the most taught and discussed topics of project management when it comes to classrooms and articles in magazines. So I figured I better do a blog about it as well. If nothing else, because I need a good topic and what could be better. Almost every project management class I have taught has had a section on Earned Value in it. Together with Charter, Schedule, WBS, and Risk, I would say it is the most lectured on topic.

But it is also true that almost no one in the classes I teach have ever, and probably will never, use it. There are exceptions of course, primarily among defense contractors, but the exceptions are few and far between. So why all the hype? I think there are two main reasons.

First, it is the most well defined project management topic out there. It tends to be exact, it has a lot of formulas, it is viewed as objective and it gives us a lot of details to impress management with. In other words, it makes project management look like science rather than art. In a world where project managers often feel that they don't have time for a process, that they need to spend more time in soft undefined communication with customers, team members, and other stakeholders. In that world it is nice to have a good formula for SPI and CPI to tell you how you are doing on the project. They can show you that you are doing great even if you know differently.

The second reason is more positive. To do earned value, we need a well defined scope, we need a WBS and a detailed schedule. We must have ways to measure progress and analyze the status of the project. And we need to forecast the future. By using earned value, we put emphasis in all of those areas. So maybe earned value can be viewed as a framework that shows how the different pieces of project management fit together. Even if it is overkill for our project, it still shows the importance of planning, execution and control.

So, the next time that you are sitting in an earned value class, listening to an earned value presentation, or reading an article about it, try to look beyond the dryness of the math; its impracticality in your small project, and the sheer boredom often inherent with EV, AC, PV, CPI, TCPI, and the other terms. There are concepts and portions of earned value that can, and in fact must, be used on any project. And they're worth talking about!

Don't forget to leave your comments below

Hits: 3517
Comments (3)Add Comment
...
written by Jobby, August 26, 2009
I have been an EVMS user for more than 5 years now.
As you mentioned, EV system puts emphasis on planning from the beginning and creating a baseline. No more excuses such as details are unknown or there will be changes etc. Use of EV facilitates changes to be managed.
To close the loop milestones should be tracked in addition to the EV indices.

...
written by sjcsr, August 26, 2009
I think you are right. I work for a Government Agency and the only projects that we use Earned Value on are the ones that are mandated due to their size. I think Earned Value is a good measure for just about any project. We have been using a home built dashboard that reports on status and requires us to baseline a project. The dashboard has incorporated SPI into the projects and as a measure of performance on the dashboard and as a result has incorporated SPI into our thinking. I have one project that I personally manage, and a dozen or more that I oversee and it has been a good experience to look at the SPI and figure out why it isn't higher and try to get in there to fix the problem (most of the time, I was aware of the reason for the delay but a few times it brought things to my attention). It is also nice to have others in my managment group, none who are PMs, discussing why the SPI isn't higher on this project and the need to work with the team to replan their project due to the SPI. Using just one of these measures of EVM has improved our project management.
...
written by abrockmeier, August 27, 2009
I have also wondered why EVM isn't used more. I, too, teach PM classes and have few students that use it. I always say there are two things you have to do to use EVM: Baseline and track. Unfortunately, my impression is that those are two things many organizations don't do with much rigor. In the absence of either one of those basics, you won't get anywhere with EVM. I agree that to the extent that exploring EVM helps you develop some discpline around those things, it's something PMs should think about using even if their stakeholders aren't ready to digest it. Working with it and developing the tools and skills around what's required to use it first is the place to start.

Write comment
We love to see comments! However, please do not market or sell any products. Your comment will be removed immediately!
smaller | bigger

busy