Changes in the external and internal environment drive the need for new projects, and those initiatives that had seemed worth funding earlier in the year are forgotten as new information emerges. To make matters worse, if work allocation and tracking practices are not consistent, it’s entirely possible that stealth work on divisional “pet projects” may be taking place which would further impact the quality of the annual project list.
While it would be ideal to mature planning practices in an organization to a more dynamic approach, this type of evolution can’t happen overnight. However, there are some incremental changes that could help to start the ball rolling.
Assuming the senior leadership team receives monthly or quarterly updates on the status of active projects, ask the following four questions once the active project status review has been completed:
- Are all of the pending (i.e. not active or completed) projects on the annual planning list still valid, and are there any on this list that we don’t intend to start this year?
- When are you intending to launch the remaining pending projects?
- Are there any other projects that your staff are actively working on that are not on this list?
- Are there any other projects that you intend to kick off this year, and if so, in what month/quarter?
The answers to these questions should enable the creation of a rolling one year planned project portfolio which would become a key input into project intake. When a new project request is submitted for consideration, if it is not on the planned project portfolio, the governance committee should be reminded of the priorities they would have been (re)set recently. While unexpected environment changes (e.g. “Black Swans”) might still cause disruption to the portfolio, this approach might help to make this situation an exception.
Annual project planning has been the norm for a very long time so one might feel that change is not feasible. However, organizations that won’t evolve are likely to appreciate Arthur C. Clarke’s quotation about the risks of complacency: “The dinosaurs disappeared because they could not adapt to their changing environment.”
Don't forget to leave your comments below.

Comments
That aside, an excellent post Kiron. So many companies talk of change and improving process management, yet turn into ostriches and stick their head in the sand when it comes time to. To create an annual plan and then basically ignore it is a waste of time and resources at best., especially when there are tools available to help this (admittedly, I am biased in that area...).
Thanks for sharing.
Kiron