Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:52

Lessons Learned from Awful Project Managers

Written by 
Rate this item
(0 votes)

After leading and participating in hundreds of projects in multiple companies, industries, and countries, I’ve found that there is as much if not more to learn by observing awful project managers than exceptional project managers.  I’d be thrilled to not spend another minute with an awful project manager; however, we might as well pick up valuable lessons even from the most unpleasant experiences.  I’ve noticed that effective project managers are worth their weight in gold especially in today’s business environment, as successful execution is vital to company profitability.  There is no room for error; thus, it’s worthwhile to learn from a few key mistakes. 

In thinking through the examples of less-than-optimal project managers, I’ve picked the three worst project manager topics: 1) Clueless on the subject matter.  2) Focusing on all the wrong priorities.  3) Leadership challenged.

1.   Clueless on the subject matter – As a project team member, this can be one of the most frustrating issues!  It is surprising how often it becomes quickly apparent that the project manager is clueless on the subject matter and wastes endless amounts of time on non-essential discussions (making zero progress) yet the project sponsor allows the misery to continue far too long, alienating the entire project team. 

If you are the project manager, you can prevent this from occurring.  If you are unsure if your level of expertise is sufficient, talk with the project sponsor upfront and obtain help.  If help isn’t available and/or is too far out of reach, turn down the leadership role – no reason to kill your career from the start.  On the other hand, you don’t need detailed expertise on every technical detail.  What is essential is that you can ask effective questions that keep the project moving forward and the team focused.  If you can do that, you are a perfect fit regardless of your level of specific expertise.

If you are the project sponsor, do not assign and run.  Ensure your choice is capable.  If you are genuinely interested in how the project is progressing and not taking a blame-oriented approach, the project members will tell you if there is a problem.  No one wants to waste time working on an obvious disaster!  If there is an issue, focus additional attention to determine whether the project manager can turn it around or whether it’s a lost cause.

2.   Focusing on all the wrong priorities – Unfortunately, I’ve seen this occur frequently as people tend to get carried away with non-essential administrative tasks.  I’ve found this question to provide a clear indication of whether there is an issue:  Is more time spent on re-arranging tasks, determining formatting and discussing the same issues as the week prior or on ensuring critical path tasks are completed on-time and under budget?

If you find that there is an issue, the great news is that this is relatively easy to resolve.  Stop all focus on software, fancy timelines and discussing tasks.  Instead, determine the critical few tasks that must be completed first in order to deliver the project and then focus on those.  Remove roadblocks.  Address sacred cows.  Follow-up.  In essence, it boils down to two keys to success – prioritize and lead.

3.   Leadership challenged – As an opposite to point #1, you could have the person with the best technical skills in the company leading the project and yet fail due to poor leadership skills.  Typically this manifests itself in communication challenges; however, it goes beyond basic communications.  I’ve seen decent communicators (proactively updating the project team, publishing progress etc.) fail miserably due to a lack of leadership abilities. 

Perfection isn’t necessary; however, basic tenets are important.  I find that as long as the project manager possesses these attributes, he/she will be successful:  1) Respected/ known for integrity (a lot of sins are forgiven when team members know they can trust the project manager).  2) Effective communicator in terms of providing the vision/ goals, ensuring the critical tasks are understood and following up and providing status on an ongoing basis.  3) Focused on what’s important (and understanding what’s important through expertise or asking effective questions) and leading progress.

In my experience, 80% of significant company progress occurs with projects (whether or not the project is official or just a group of tasks coordinated by a group of individuals).  Therefore, effective project management can be critical to success.  Why not learn from not only the good project managers but also the worst?

 Don't forget to leave your comments below.

Read 2770 times Last modified on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 13:54
Lisa Anderson

Lisa Anderson, President of LMA Consulting Group, Inc., www.lma-consultinggroup.com, is a senior supply chain and operations executive and management consultant. To sign up for her free monthly newsletter containing tips and techniques for improving business performance, click here. She can be reached at 909-630-3943 or landerson@lma-consultinggroup.com

Comments  

 
0 # J Towne 2011-02-16 05:16
I understand and agree with the points provided above however, as working under less efficient and skilled PM's I would like to add a few. 1.Identify capabilities and let the BA’s do their job. By this I mean you as a PM must acknowledge the resources you have and identify quickly their qualifications. If someone is technical, parse them out on the technical aspects of the project. If someone has attention to detail, provide them with the tasks that require the most scrutiny. 2.Change is good. Like politics we need to renew and exchange players to find the best fit. To often we let someone stay in “office” without challenge. Please know, I’m not saying after one mistake remove a resource. Allow them the opportunity to make mistakes but also afford them the opportunity to make up for it. If the mistakes are not fixed, change the resource out. Now be careful and tactful on this one, I say change the resource. Do not just absorb the extra effort onto the proverbial plate of others. Replace or change the resource or shift responsibilitie s. Please note this caveat also requires that changes do not happen to often. Shifting resources and/or responsibilitie s every other week or day will have an adverse affect. You will create an unpleasant atmosphere. Not to mention resources do not have the opportunity to become comfortable in their roles and will not be able to complete the task. This brings me back to my first point. If you are unaware of a resources capabilities, find out.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Rakesh 2011-02-16 19:28
Good article.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Lisa 2011-02-17 15:15
Good points! I completely agree - if you do your best to help the PM improve performance and there is no progress, it would be a disaster to not address. Sometimes a particular job isn't a fit - both the employee and company are better off proactively addressing the situation.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # MyATM Holdings 2011-02-26 10:41
I wish all the awful managers out there would be able to read this. This would be helpful for them to become a better mangers in the future. Thanks for sharing this ideas!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # g w gardener 2011-03-01 23:47
Being from the construction industry I find the first point fascinating. A project manager in my industry should have technical expertise, otherwise how can he do the job. How can someone make project decisions if they do not understand the construction process.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Lisa 2011-03-02 02:34
Interesting point regarding construction. That is an industry which would benefit from specific expertise; however, I'd still contend that someone with enough technical expertise to ask good questions and ensure the project stays on track (even if he/she didn't have as much technical expertise as others) would be preferable to someone with significant technical expertise who is clueless as a project manager.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Mary 2011-07-06 10:54
I am experiencing all of the above right now in a project I am involved in. How does one move the immovable? From the project sponsor down there is a project management, lack of leadership, lack of technical understanding (essentially a change in legislation and regulation which we are the regulators for - this is a jurisdictional change in our country) and wrong persons for the PM role and under resourced for the technical roles. I am feverishly tracking my own project and thankfully I am on schedule and meeting goals, but it is a bit of a tightrope endeavour because I am dependent upon 3 other projects to deliver to me. I will certainly have a good bunch of lessons learned from this experience!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment