Monday, 17 November 2008 19:00

Answering Some Standardized Questions

Written by  Mike Lecky
Rate this item
(0 votes)
Why refer to a standard for project management?

How can a standard for project management deliver value?
When it comes to technology we can all appreciate the benefit having standards. We plug many different devices into the electrical power receptacle and they all work. We listen to songs and podcasts from hundreds of publishers in MP3 format on our iPod. We can print from essentially any computer to any printer provided we’ve installed the correct printer driver to establish the interface.

Standardized technology enables interchangeability and facilitates international exchange of goods and services. It removes barriers to trade and promotes transfer of technology. It has the effect of reducing variety leading to increased economies of scale.

Standardization has the effect of increasing the availability of products and increasing the interchangeability of products that must perform together. Functional characteristics and methods of testing become widely understood spawning improvement and innovation.

The BSI Group, founded as the British Standards Committee in 1901, states it nicely:
“Standards help to make life simpler and to increase the reliability and the effectiveness of many goods and services we use.”

It’s really an easy stretch of the imagination to envision all these benefits of standardization applying to the processes and technology of project management. And when we consider the spin BSI puts on it, who wouldn’t strive for standardization in every aspect of their project management program.
Read 3248 times Last modified on Tuesday, 24 March 2009 05:39

Comments  

 
0 # cobrien 2008-11-18 10:54
Hi Mike I'm a supporter of standards in the execution of project management processes for many of the reasons you mention, but I must confess, I get pretty annoyed when following a corporate standard involves filling in large unwieldy templates that no one uses or understands. Unfortunately the drive towards standard project management processes has too often focused solely on creating documentation standards, as opposed to concentrating on other areas such as ensuring all project goals are measurable or meet acceptable quality parameters. If the standard implemented does not make life simpler or improve desired results, then I’m not sure it passes the usefulness test. Cheers Chris
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # bmossing 2008-11-22 16:40
Choosing the right standards to apply to each unique project is the tricky part. Yes, we want to consistently apply a methodology that works along with the correct resources and tools...when they're appropriate for this particular project. So what's appropriate? Chris' comment is right on the money...don't overwhelm my schedule or my budget just to put a check in the "we met that standard" box. Each project is unique and requires the perfect application of standards, leadership, communication, etc. Flexibility is key. I posted an article to my blog that relates to this titled "Project Rigor Mortis." Check it out if you have a chance. Brian Mossing www.ClearPM.com
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment